"Rough Around the Edges" equivalent to a Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe at half the price
For the past several years, Swedish chainsaw maker Husqvarna has been offering rebadged versions of Wetterlings and Hults Bruks
axes and hatchets at greatly reduced prices. For the savvy axe buyer,
this can represent an excellent opportunity to pick up expensive name
brand Swedish axes at steep discounts. The latest offering from
Husqvarna, called the Forest Axe, continues this tradition, in that it is essentially a rebadged Swedish Hultafors HY 20 Felling Axe.
The SPECS:
Head Weight: 2 lbs
Steel type: Hand forged Swedish high carbon steel (composition unknown)
Overall length: 26"
Handle type: American Hickory
Country of Origin: Made in Sweden by Hults Bruks\Hultafors
Weight with sheath: 43.4 ounces (as measured on a digital postal scale)
Weight without sheath: 42.4 ounces (as measured on a digital postal scale)
Retail Price: $65.88
Features
The Forest Axe features a hand forged, high carbon Swedish steel head which weighs in at 2 lbs. The handle is 26" long and made from American Hickory. A simple, yet functional leather sheath covers the bit to keep it protected.
HEAD PROFILE
The bit on the Forest Axe came out of the box reasonably sharp, though not as sharp as most Gransfors Bruks and Wetterlings axes. However, the profile is very thin, so honing it to razor sharpness was easy and only took a few minutes.
The cheeks are also a bit rough compared to offerings from the
aforementioned axe companies, showing large grinding marks, etc.
However, this didn't seem to hinder the performance of the axe, as
you'll see in the field test below.
As mentioned, the Forest Axe is essentially a rebadged Hultafors' HY 20
Felling Axe. Here's a photo of the Husqvarna (left) next to the
Hultafors HY 20 (right):
(click to enlarge)
(click to enlarge)
Axe Comparison Shots
As noted in the profile section, the Forest Axe replaces the older
"Multi-Purpose Axe", which was manufactured by Wetterlings at the time.
Here's a comparison shot of the two (Forest Axe on left):
Profile shot (Forest Axe on left):
Closeup of the bit profiles:
(click to enlarge)
Profile comparison (Husqvarna on left):
Profile comparison of the two (Forest Axe on right)
(click to enlarge)
Handle/Handle Grain/Alignment/Balance
(click to enlarge)
The handle came from the factory with a
light coat of linseed oil. It is a little thicker than the handles on
Gransfors Bruks or Best Made/Council Tool axes of this size, which I
initially thought would make it rather bulky and unwieldy. After using
it a bit, I was pleasantly surprised to find that I preferred it over
the other handles. It is thick, but the way Hultafors profiles the
handle makes it feel comfortable and secure in the hand.
The alignment is almost perfect:
The handle is pinned to the head with a traditional wooden wedge and
reinforced with a circular metal pin-style wedge. With the exception of a
small gap at the four o'clock area of the eye, the overall quality of
the head/handle joint is excellent. Over the course of 6 months of
regular use, the handle stayed secure and never budged.
Using the Mors Kochanski balance test, the Forest Axe balances very well, with only a slight hint of heaviness in the bit.
(click to enlarge)
FIELD TESTING
I received this axe back in March for testing, so it was used quite
extensively before writing this review. As mentioned in the "Head
Profile" section, the bit came sharp, though not shaving sharp as is
typical of most Gransfors Bruks axes. The quality of the steel and
hardness are very similar to Gransfors axes, so getting the edge to
hair-shaving sharp was easy and only took a few minutes with a diamond sharpener and stone.
Hults Bruks, maker of this axe, is Sweden's oldest axe company and
highly respected in Europe. For a more comprehensive history of Hults
Bruks, check out Woodtrekker Blog's "A Brief History of Swedish Axe Manufacturers."
In order to test the Forest Axe, I assembled a battery of five tests that I felt would be a good assessment for a full-size, all-purpose bushcraft axe. These include Chopping, Splitting, and Limbing as well fine carving tasks, such as making feather-sticks and carving a tent stake. I also wanted to see how well the Forest Axe would perform in comparison to the similarly-sized Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe, which literally costs twice as much as the Husqvarna. My goal was to see if the budget-priced Forest Axe could perform as well as the pricier Gransfors.
In order to test the Forest Axe, I assembled a battery of five tests that I felt would be a good assessment for a full-size, all-purpose bushcraft axe. These include Chopping, Splitting, and Limbing as well fine carving tasks, such as making feather-sticks and carving a tent stake. I also wanted to see how well the Forest Axe would perform in comparison to the similarly-sized Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe, which literally costs twice as much as the Husqvarna. My goal was to see if the budget-priced Forest Axe could perform as well as the pricier Gransfors.
Chopping Comparisons
I pitted the Husqvarna against several popular axes to see how it would measure up. Each axe was chopped 30 times for the comparison.
Forest Axe vs the Best Made Hudson Bay Axe- The
competition between these two axes was a draw. The thinner bit of the
Husqvarna allowed it to bite deep into the wood, while the heavier head
and wider bit of the Best Made made it take out shallow, yet large
pieces of wood.
Forest Axe vs the previous Husqvarna Multi-Purpose Axe- I felt that the older Multi-Purpose Axe had a slight advantage, owing to it's heavier head. The photo doesn't convey this advantage very well, as the Multi Purpose Axe chopped as deep as the Forest Axe even though the area that I chopped had more knots. Winner- Older Husqvarna Multi-Purpose Axe
Forest Axe vs the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe- The slightly heavier head (the Forest Axe weighs roughly 2 ounces more than the Gransfors), 1" longer handle and thinner bit of the Forest Axe gave it a clear chopping advantage over the Gransfors Bruks. Winner- Forest Axe
(click to enlarge)
Forest Axe vs the previous Husqvarna Multi-Purpose Axe- I felt that the older Multi-Purpose Axe had a slight advantage, owing to it's heavier head. The photo doesn't convey this advantage very well, as the Multi Purpose Axe chopped as deep as the Forest Axe even though the area that I chopped had more knots. Winner- Older Husqvarna Multi-Purpose Axe
(click to enlarge)
Forest Axe vs the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe- The slightly heavier head (the Forest Axe weighs roughly 2 ounces more than the Gransfors), 1" longer handle and thinner bit of the Forest Axe gave it a clear chopping advantage over the Gransfors Bruks. Winner- Forest Axe
(click to enlarge)
FINE CARVING
The thin bit on the Forest Axe makes it surprisingly adept at finer
work. I was surprised to find that it slightly out-performed both the
older Multi-Purpose Axe and the Best Made Hudson Bay when making
feather-sticks, as shown in the photo below.
(Note- the Gransfors Bruks seen in the chopping comparison was a late arrival, so it is not seen in the fine carving comparison below. But the Husqvarna did compare very favorably to the Gransfors in some last minute feather-stick tests that I performed)
(Note- the Gransfors Bruks seen in the chopping comparison was a late arrival, so it is not seen in the fine carving comparison below. But the Husqvarna did compare very favorably to the Gransfors in some last minute feather-stick tests that I performed)
(click to enlarge)
A tent stake carved from a dead Aspen branch, using only the Forest Axe (who says you gotta have a knife to survive in the wilderness!):
(click to enlarge)
SPLITTING
My biggest concern with the Forest Axe was its ability to split logs,
due to the thin profile of the head. True, it won't split with the ease
of say a Fiskars X15 or a Council Tool\Best Made Hudson Bay axe, but it still split well enough to do a respectable job out in the bush.
(click to enlarge)
Success!
LIMBING
To test the Forest Axe's ability to limb a tree, I found a dead
Lodgepole Pine, that had been blown over by a wind storm many years ago,
and went to town. The Forest Axe performed excellently in this test.
(click to enlarge)
I then bucked the limbed tree into sections. Once again, the Forest Axe performed well and made this job a pleasure.
(click to enlarge)
Conclusion
Another positive is the quality of the
steel. It's hard, yet easy to sharpen and holds an edge, very similar to
the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe. In fact, during my chopping
tests against the Gransfors (I usually chop several more times than
what's shown in my test photographs) I could detect no difference in
edge-holding between the two. The edge also never chipped or rolled
during 6 months of hard use, another indication of the excellent quality
of the steel on this axe.
The leather sheath was also a surprise. Initially, my impression of it was rather lackluster, knowing the high quality of Wetterlings and Gransfors sheaths. Not only has it been durable, but I actually learned to appreciate having a sheath without a strap, as you can leave it on when hammering tent stakes or tapping logs without having to worry about damaging it.
One other thing to note is that, as of right now, this is the only way to buy a Hults Bruks axe in the US, since Hults doesn't sell directly to the US (hopefully, this will change soon!).
In the subtitle of this review, I made the claim that the Forest Axe is a "rough around the edges" equivalent to a Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe, and I stand by that. For half the price of the Gransfors, you get a high quality, hand-forged, traditional Swedish axe that outchops the Gransfors, performs fine carving tasks just as well, and is nearly as balanced. Husqvarna seems to change manufacturers rather frequently, so if were you, I would grab one of these axes before they switch makers again.
About the author
Jason Schwartz is the founder and senior editor of Rocky Mountain Bushcraft, a blog that features articles, news stories, outdoor tips and product reviews written from a bushcraft and wilderness survival perspective. Schwartz is a former Red Cross certified Wilderness & Remote First Aid Instructor and has taught bushcraft and wilderness survival techniques to the Boy Scouts of America. He has also written for the The New Pioneer and Backpacker, including writing the "Tinder Finder" portion of Backpacker's "Complete Guide to Fire," which won a 2015 National Magazine Award (NMA). Email him at rockymountainbushcraft @ hotmail.com (without spaces)
